Cudahy; Why? Just Because?; Cudahy Mayor Ryan Mccue Needs to Provide a Good Reason for His Vote Against a Proposal for a Wal- Mart Supercenter and Indoor Soccer Training Facility.
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel › May 10, 2008
Linked as:
The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel › May 10, 2008
Linked as:Summary
Cudahy Mayor Ryan McCue owes his constituents an explanation of why he voted this week against a proposed development that would have included a Wal-Mart Supercenter and an indoor soccer training facility. Maintaining silence on why he broke a deadlocked Plan Commission and voted to reject the proposal is an insult to the people who put McCue in office. They deserve better.
And the reason should be better than the idea that Cudahy's image somehow would be damaged by having a Wal-Mart within the city limits. There is nothing inherently wrong with having a one-stop, low-cost store that will bring jobs to a neighborhood. In fact, given the current economic climate, there is a good case to be made that a Wal-Mart would help Cudahy families much more than it might - - might -- hurt the city's image.See the full content of this document
Extract
Cudahy; Why? Just Because?; Cudahy Mayor Ryan Mccue Needs to Provide a Good Reason for His Vote Against a Proposal for a Wal- Mart Supercenter and Indoor Soccer Training Facility.
While it's true that the city's master plan for the site where the Wa...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
California American Water Launches Residential Water Audits for Homes and Apartments for Its Ventura Coun... | U.S House Bill Would Track Backover Accidents | Karen Capodanno Named Vice President of the Commerce Bank Lending Team | Building I-69 the Issue Cost Estimates Ride a Roller Coaster Our View It Will Get Done. | Dictamen nº 38911 de Contraloría General de la República, de November 02, 1988 | Sentencia nº 2926 de Consiglio di Stato, June 10, 2009 | 1,8 millones de ahorristas afectados | Sentencia nº 249 de Consiglio di Stato, January 16, 2008